The Worst Planes And Helicopters Ever Made

The Wright Brothers are probably the most well-known aircraft designers in history. They made many mistakes along the way, but there were plenty of other design failures that you've probably never heard about. Read on to see some of the worst military and commercial aircraft in aviation history and find out why they made the list.

The Fisher P-75 Eagle Was A Let-Down

 Fisher P-75 Eagle
Lewis Adams/Pinterest
Lewis Adams/Pinterest

Everything about the Fisher P-75 Eagle was supposed to be a success. The "75" came from the French 75-mm gun of the Great War, so it was a symbol of victory. Adding eagle to the name stood for American greatness and the media helped build the hype of this aircraft.

The P-75 Eagle was the Frankenstein of interceptors as it combined parts from better aircraft. Sadly, the engine used for the Eagle didn't live up to the hype of everything else and was highly disappointing. It lacked horsepower and made the overall performance of the Eagle underwhelming.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Accident-Prone Douglas DC-10

ADVERTISEMENT
Douglas DC-10
Contributor/Getty Images
Contributor/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Having had 55 accidents with many fatalities to date, the DC-10 is one of the most poorly-manufactured jets to exist. Probably the biggest issue with it is that the cargo doors opened outward, as opposed to inward like regular planes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Due to this flaw, an improperly closed door flew open in the middle of a flight in 1972, alerting the need for a redesign. Something similar happened in 1974, and then in 1979, an engine fell off the wing during take-off. Today, the carrier is much safer thanks to many redesigns.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Bell FM-1 Airacuda

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Bell-FM-1-Airacuda-40768
Priscilla Prunean/Pinterest
Priscilla Prunean/Pinterest
ADVERTISEMENT

The Bell Aircraft Corporation was new to the scene in 1937 and had a futuristic look combined with unconventional features that hid the long list of flaws. While the Bell FM-1 Airacuda placement of engine and guns made it easier for the weapons to fire at bomber formations, the engine would overheat.

ADVERTISEMENT

The rear propellors spelled death for any gunner that needed to bail out. To make things even worse, when you fired the guns, the gunner stations would get filled with smoke!

ADVERTISEMENT

The Cutlass Struggled

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
hjm
Pinterest
Pinterest
ADVERTISEMENT

The Vought F7U Cutlass had one of the more interesting designs. By getting rid of the traditional tail and bringing in a swept-wing design, the aircraft had its fair share of problems since the first time it flew. Yes, the Cutlass was fast, but at times it would struggle to stay in the air.

ADVERTISEMENT

To add insult to injury, the turbojets on the F7U didn't pack enough thrust for sufficient take-offs and landings. At least three of the prototypes crashed. Twenty-five percent of these aircraft became lost thanks to accidents.

ADVERTISEMENT

An Atomically Bad Idea

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
NB-36H_with_B-50,_1955_ DF-SC-83-09332
Adam Radford/Pinterest
Adam Radford/Pinterest
ADVERTISEMENT

A nuclear reactor is a device used to start and control a nuclear chain reaction. They are most commonly used at nuclear power plants. But in the '50s, someone came up with the idea of adding a nuclear reactor to an aircraft.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Convair NB-36 "Atomic wait" was a disaster waiting to happen whenever it took off into the air. The U.S. intended to test operating a nuclear reactor in-flight. Flying this carrier out was so dangerous that it only flew 47 times and a team of support aircraft had to follow it every time.

ADVERTISEMENT

An Odd-Looking Jet

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
10638
Demetris Plastourgos 1/Pinterest
Demetris Plastourgos 1/Pinterest
ADVERTISEMENT

Designed in Poland, the PZL M-15 Belphegor is the only mass-produced biplane in history. This biplane was also absolutely terrible. The design was created in 1972 and its first purpose was to be operated as a crop duster that sprayed the soviet farms.

ADVERTISEMENT

Looking back, it probably wasn't a good idea to design a crop duster equipped with jet power. These jets were also more expensive to run than the planes they were to replace. Overall, this was a pointless creation.

ADVERTISEMENT

On The Wright Path

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
wright
SSPL/Getty Images
SSPL/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

According to the Smithsonian Institution, the Wright Flyer was “the first powered, heavier-than-air machine to achieve controlled, sustained flight with a pilot aboard." They forgot to mention that the time in the air lasted a maximum of 59 seconds.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was also hard to manage and only covered 852 feet. On December 17, 1903, the Wright Flyer flew four times, but it would never retake flight because the pilot basically had no control over it. It was a significant step forward for innovation, but not so good for pilots.

ADVERTISEMENT

A Rip-Off Of The Harrier Jump Jet

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Tanguy Rochereau/Pinterest
Tanguy Rochereau/Pinterest
ADVERTISEMENT

Militaries across the world saw how much of an advantage it was to have a vertical take-off and landing fighter much like the Harrier Jump Jet used by the British Navy. That's when the Soviet Union came up with the Yakovlev Yak-38.

ADVERTISEMENT

It worked nothing like the Harrier. It could only fly a measly 800 miles at a time without weapons. Another downfall was that it could only fly for 15 minutes at a time in hot weather. The only good thing about this jet was the ejector seat.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Heinkel He 162 Volksjagerthe Had Glue Problems

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
he-162
Bettmann / Contributor
Bettmann / Contributor
ADVERTISEMENT

The Heinkel He-162 was quickly designed and produced: from the first drawings of it to the beginning of production only took 90 days. Due to a shortage of metal during the war, this aerodynamic plane was built of wood.

ADVERTISEMENT

The idea was that these planes could be flown by teenage pilots with only basic flight training. But they ended up needing more careful handling than planned. Also, the glue used to hold these together actually corroded the plane's airframe. Oops. The Heinkel He-162 was introduced in January of 1945 and retired in May of that same year.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Price Was Too Steep

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Lockheed Martin VH-71 Kestrel
Ricardo T H/Pinterest
Ricardo T H/Pinterest
ADVERTISEMENT

If you're looking at the Lockheed Martin VH-71 Kestrel from an aeronautical point of view, this helicopter is excellent. So why isn't in service anymore? Back in 2002, AgustaWestland and Lockheed Martin agreed to develop and market this beast in America.

ADVERTISEMENT

The aircraft won a competition to become the new fleet of helicopters used by the Marine Corps and Presidential transport in 2005, but at what cost? In four years, the contract for this project had jumped from $6.1 billion to $11.2 billion! Some blame the high prices on additional requests or improper lobby ties.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Fast Research Plane Experience

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Bristol 188
NCJ - Topix/Mirrorpix/Mirrorpix via Getty Images
NCJ - Topix/Mirrorpix/Mirrorpix via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Everyone loves keeping up with the Joneses. That's why after Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier in a Bell X-1 in 1947, many other air forces wanted to have a fast research plane. Enter the British Bristol 188 that turned out to be extremely flawed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Would you want to fly in something where the fuel tank leaked whenever you were flying? What about not being able to take off until you reach 300mph? The Bristol was supposed to be able to reach Mach 2.6, but it struggled to hit Mach 2!

ADVERTISEMENT

The Little Goblin

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
McDonnell XF-85 Goblin
Peter Crimmin/Pinterest
Peter Crimmin/Pinterest
ADVERTISEMENT

The idea for the McDonnell XF-85 Goblin is that it was a parasite fighter. That meant the Goblin would be attached to a larger bomber for takeoff, then mid-flight they would release the parasite so it could fight off other planes.

ADVERTISEMENT

The idea sounds great, but the biggest issue is that the Goblin would get outgunned by the enemies in combat. The battle struggles were because of the .50-cal machine guns it used. Soon enough, the project ended.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Douglas TBD Devastator Was A Total Death-Trap

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
douglas
Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

The Douglas TBD Devastator had a serious, and deadly, design flaw. The aircraft could only release its torpedo while it flew in a completely straight line at the very slow speed of 115 miles per hour. It was basically a sitting duck.

ADVERTISEMENT

During the Battle of Midway, the Devastator fleet suffered a catastrophe. Out of the 41 Devastators launched during the battle, only six survived to return to their carriers. This was a tragic loss for the U.S. Navy.

ADVERTISEMENT

A Bizarre Idea

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Lockheed XFV-1 Salmon
4495/Pinterest
4495/Pinterest
ADVERTISEMENT

In the 1950s, the U.S. military had a ton of bizarre ideas. Thanks to a beefed-up military budget, many of the concepts came to fruition. The whole focus behind the Lockheed XFV-1 Salmon was enabling it to take off vertically almost like a rocket.

ADVERTISEMENT

A vertical take-off is excellent for a point defense interceptor, but it came with a massive flaw for pilots. It meant that you would have to land vertically, but backward. There were also issues with the engine tearing itself into pieces.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Grumman X-29 Was Aerodynamically Unstable

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Grumman X-29
NASA / Larry Sammons
NASA / Larry Sammons
ADVERTISEMENT

In the 1980s and '90s, the U.S. Air Force used a Grumman X-29A with a unique forward-swept wing in fighter jet research. The wing configuration was intended to help the plane handle better at subsonic speeds but instead made it completely aerodynamically unstable.

ADVERTISEMENT

Developed by Grumman, NASA, the Air Force, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the plane was a disaster. A NASA historian said of the X-29A, "It was unflyable -- literally -- without a digital flight computer on board, which made corrections to the flight path 40 times a second."

ADVERTISEMENT

The First Commercial Jet Powered Airliner

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
comet
Science & Society Picture Library/SSPL/Getty Images
Science & Society Picture Library/SSPL/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

There are many great things one can say about the De Havilland Comet, but the bad certainly outweighs the good. The Comet might have had a great run, but there were things that you can't pass up like how it overshot runways and mid-air decompressions.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Comet soon became the blueprint for how not to create an aircraft. They redesigned and updated it various times while it was in service, but that didn't stop the fatal accidents from tampering with its reputation.

ADVERTISEMENT

The First Ever German-designed Airliner

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Baade 152
Quatillion/Reddit
Quatillion/Reddit
ADVERTISEMENT

The Baade 152 was the first German-designed airliner they based on a slew of bomber concepts. The features it had like a high-wing and outrigger wheels on the wing tips work very well with bombers, but not airliners. In only its second flight the prototype crashed.

ADVERTISEMENT

The entire crew died as a result of that crash. On a separate occasion, engineers found out the fuel lines stopped during a descent, which caused the engines to quit. Once the project ended in 1961, the Baade became the only East German plane ever made.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Tupolev TU- 144 Was Unreliable And Very Loud

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
tupelov
BENNATI/AFP/Getty Images
BENNATI/AFP/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

This futuristic-looking Russian-built jet was one of two supersonic transport aircraft ever to enter commercial service (the other was the Concorde). It could reach the staggering speed of 1,200 miles per hour. But people just don't have the love for the Tupolev Tu-144, due to its terrible and tragic service history.

ADVERTISEMENT

The aircraft was extremely unreliable and failed during flight numerous times. In fact, there was a failure on a fuel tank valve during the final passenger flight of Tu-144 in 1978. Cabin noise in the plane was also problematic: passengers seated next to each other had to pass hand-written notes because it was impossible to hear voices over the engine roar.

ADVERTISEMENT

Exciting Look, With Bad Performance

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Rockwell XFV-12
Michael Lockhart/Pinterest
Michael Lockhart/Pinterest
ADVERTISEMENT

By the time the '70s came around, you would have thought that the richest and biggest aviation industry in the world wouldn't create aircraft that couldn't fly. Then, they said, "hold my beer" and created the Rockwell XFV-12.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Rockwell looked as fancy as they come with its wing style and pointed front, but looks can be deceiving. It used an interesting system called the "thrust augmentor wing" allowing the engine to enable verticle flight. Sadly, it could only lift three-quarters of it off the ground, and it never flew.

ADVERTISEMENT

Air Forces Ditched The MiG-23

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
mig-23
Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

The Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-23, better known as a MiG-23, was a Soviet-designed fighter aircraft and the first Soviet plane with a 'look-down/shoot-down' radar. Production on the craft began in 1970. The 23 was meant to replace the earlier MiG-21 model, but due to the fact that the pilot had to sit in a narrow and cramped cockpit with limited vision, the MiG-21 remained more popular than its replacement.

ADVERTISEMENT

After the Cold War, many air forces retired their MiG-23s but kept their MiG-21s. However, there are still some MiG-23s in limited service today.

ADVERTISEMENT

Great Craftsmanship Doesn't Always Lead To Results

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
aerodome
Hulton Archive/Getty Images
Hulton Archive/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

A man by the name of Samuel Pierpont Langley was a brilliant inventor and scientist who was also the secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. After creating a great model aircraft that flew over a mile in 1901, he decided to step it up and build the first manned power flight.

ADVERTISEMENT

All of the specs for the Aerodrome were on point. It had 52hp radial, the best power-to-weight ratio out of all the engines out there. The only (rather large) downfall is that it couldn't fly. It flew off of its catapult and fell into the Potomac River. Twice.

ADVERTISEMENT

"The Devil's Hoverbike"

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Hoverbike
Chris Meinke/Pinterest
Chris Meinke/Pinterest
ADVERTISEMENT

In the 1950s, the U.S. Army thought that having their infantryman hover into battle was the right thing to do. Not with jetpacks, but on a one-person helicopter. One of the scary things about this aircraft is that the rotor blades are only four inches under the feet!

ADVERTISEMENT

Pilots had to balance on a tiny platform with deadly blades waiting for them to slip. They finally realized that this idea just made people more of a target than offering help on the battlefield.

ADVERTISEMENT

Danger In The Air

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Tupolev Tu-144
Sobottaullstein bild via Getty Images
Sobottaullstein bild via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

The Tupolev Tu-144 was one of two supersonic airliners with the other being the Concorde. Both came out in the late '70s, and the Concorde became an icon while the Tupolev was overall dangerous. It's not good when the first passenger prototype crashes at the Paris Air show.

ADVERTISEMENT

That crash happened thanks to 22 out of the 24 central systems failing mid-flight. Engineers also found that two airframes used were close to complete failure. The aircraft only took flight 55 times before getting shut down for good.

ADVERTISEMENT

A Horrible French Attempt

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Dassault Balzac V
Jason Watkins/Pinterest
Jason Watkins/Pinterest
ADVERTISEMENT

Some ideas look fantastic on paper but turn out horrible in reality. That's what happened with the Dassault Balzac V, a French attempt at creating a fighter jet that could land and take off vertically. They got the idea from the modified version of the successful Mirage III fighter.

ADVERTISEMENT

During testing of the Dassault, two pilots died, but that didn't stop them from creating a prototype that also crashed. Thankfully, the pilot ejected himself successfully.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Worst Aircraft Ever Built

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
sddfhfghf
Light Yagami/Pinterest
Light Yagami/Pinterest
ADVERTISEMENT

We aren't pulling any punches with this one. The Christmas Bullet is more than likely the worst aircraft ever built. It doesn't help that a psychopath designed it or that his partner who helped warned him. Dr. William Whitney Christmas is the creator of this project.

ADVERTISEMENT

Vincent J. Bernelli, who was dragged into helping in the design, made a point of emphasizing that he only had a hand in the fuselage of the plane. The plane had the ability to gain enough height to ensure the death of the pilot. Christmas asked pilot Cuthbert Mills to test it, so Mills invited his mother to watch. As it took off the wings folded and the Bullet crashed, killing Mills.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Messerschmitt Me 163 Komet Could Only Carry Three Minutes' Worth Of Fuel

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
komet
Science & Society Picture Library/SSPL/Getty Images
Science & Society Picture Library/SSPL/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

This intimidating-looking aircraft is the Messerschmitt Me 163 Komet. It was a rocket-powered interceptor specifically designed to shoot down enemy aircraft raiding Germany. Although it was fast, and could reach speeds 100 miles per hour faster than any plane in the Allied fleet, it could only carry enough fuel to last three minutes!

ADVERTISEMENT

This meant the aircraft had to glide down to earth after each brief mission. Fuel leaks incurred during these hard landings frequently caused fires and explosions. Many pilots were killed during testing and training the Komet.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Italian Noviplano Was Just Plain Ugly

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
CaproniCa.60
Wikimedia
Wikimedia
ADVERTISEMENT

Italian plane–maker Caproni built the Ca 60 Noviplano during the 1920s. It was designed to carry 100 passengers across the Atlantic Ocean. Unfortunately, the plane only flew twice and didn't even make it out of the country. On its second flight, it took off from Lake Maggiori in Italy and made it only 60 feet into the air before it came crashing down into the water.

ADVERTISEMENT

The plane had three sets of three wings, meaning nine in total, and eight engines. With such a cumbersome body design, this plane was doomed to fail. Adding insult to injury, the wreckage was damaged by fire as it was towed back to shore.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Blackburn 'Roc' Was A Total Design Failure

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Blackburn Roc
Charles E. Brown/Royal Air Force Museum/Getty Images
Charles E. Brown/Royal Air Force Museum/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Designed to be a defense fighting plane that could protect other aircraft from enemies, the Roc was outfitted with a four-machine-gun turret directly behind the pilot. This made the plane incredibly heavy and, as a result, too slow to do its intended job.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Roc was such a design disaster that the Royal Navy wouldn't even let it fly from its carriers. It only shot down one aircraft throughout the entirety of WWII.

ADVERTISEMENT

Blackburn's Botha Was Deemed 'Worthless'

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Blackburn_Botha_at_RAF_Silloth_WWII_IWM_CH_1907
Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

Blackburn really had a couple of design bombs in the 1930s and 40s. The second one on our list is the Botha, a two-engined torpedo bomber and reconnaissance aircraft. Its had three glaring design flaws and was eventually deemed "worthless."

ADVERTISEMENT

For starters, the view from the crew compartment was so bad that the plane couldn't be used for recon at all. It was also underpowered. A fourth crew member was required, which increased the weight. This meant the plane was ineffective at firing torpedoes. Finally, the Botha was incredibly difficult to fly and there were many fatal accidents as a result. In all, the aircraft was a failure.

ADVERTISEMENT

Believe It Or Not, The Embraer EMB-120 Brasilia Is Still In Service

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
emb-120
Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

You might not guess so based on its odd appearance, but the Embraer EMB-120 Brasilia is still in service as a commuter plane. One of the twin turbo-prop planes broke up in flight in 1991, killing all 14 aboard. That is just one incident in a long list of problems with the Embraer EMB-120.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although it's been called one of the worst passenger planes in history, Dallas-based Ameriflight airlines still uses 10 of them as freighters.

ADVERTISEMENT

This British Royal Flying Corps Experiment Was Not A Successful One

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
RAF_B.E.9
Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

During WWI, the British Royal Flying Corps created an experimental reconnaissance aircraft called the B.E.9. It modified previous models by increasing the field of fire for the observer's machine gun. However, this layout backfired tremendously.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although the gunner had a much better field of vision, his position left him at risk of injury. He could be cut in two by the propeller blades or crushed to death by the engine if the aircraft was to crash. A commander of RAF defenses called it "an extremely dangerous machine from the passenger's point of view."

ADVERTISEMENT

Pilots Didn't Like Flying The Fairey Albacore

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
fairy-albacore
DeAgostini/Getty Images
DeAgostini/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

You know a plane's not designed well if pilots insist on flying an older model instead of the new one that was meant to be an improved replacement. That's exactly what happened when Fairey Aviation built the Albacore as a replacement for its Swordfish model.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Albacore was a single-engine biplane torpedo bomber, constructed from 1939 to 1943 for the British Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm. Pilots didn't like flying the Albacore, and it was actually retired from service earlier than the Swordfish.

ADVERTISEMENT

First-Hand Description Of Flying In A Yak-42

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
yak-42
aviation-images.com/UIG via Getty Images
aviation-images.com/UIG via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

In a Jalopnik article about badly designed aircraft, user Sir Halffast shared his experience on the Russian passenger jet Yakovlev Yak-42. "The thought that a plane of this 'caliber' is still operating in 2013 is terrible," he wrote.

ADVERTISEMENT

"I had the misfortune of flying in one on a domestic Ukrainian flight from Kyiv to Donetsk, and was amazed. For one, the top of the entry door is chest high on a 6'0" man. And of course, it has the horrible Soviet seats that fold flat forward with little provocation. And the rear stairway that rattles in flight as if it's about to pop open at any moment." Yikes!

ADVERTISEMENT

No Love For The Ilyushin Il-62

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
il2
aviation-images.com/UIG via Getty Images
aviation-images.com/UIG via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

In the same Jalopnik discussion about readers' experiences on badly-designed planes, a pilot with the username For Sweden wrote in about flying the Soviet-era passenger jet Ilyushin Il-62. "It still uses manual flight controls, no power assist to move those flight control surfaces," he explained.

ADVERTISEMENT

"If some ice gets in a hinge, it's just your muscles that will break it loose. It also has a history of failed thrust reversers and exploding engines that damage neighboring engines."

ADVERTISEMENT

The Brewster Buffalo Was Overweight And Unstable

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
buffalo-85299
Pinterest/lando1980
Pinterest/lando1980
ADVERTISEMENT

The Brewster Buffalo was the U.S. Navy's first monoplane fighter aircraft. It was also used by the Finnish, Royal, and Royal Australian Air Forces. The craft was active at the beginning of WW2 but was already considered obsolete at the end of the war. The Buffalo was overweight, unpredictable, and difficult to maneuver. It was no match for the Japanese air fleet.

ADVERTISEMENT

It also had notoriously weak landing gear that often collapsed during hard carrier landings. Some USMC pilots called the Buffalo a "flying coffin."

ADVERTISEMENT

The ATR 72 Had An Abyssmal Safety Record

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ATR_72
Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

Before American Eagle retired its fleet of ATR 72s, Jalopnik contributor Alex Murel advised people to avoid the extremely dangerous aircraft altogether. "Its massively outdated, and the existing fleet is really starting to fall apart," he explained.

ADVERTISEMENT

"I understand that turbo props can be more cost efficient for some flights, but these are old and feel like they're shaking the plane apart. 11 of the 508 built have been destroyed in crashes that resulted in the deaths of over 190 people," he continued. Those numbers certainly aren't reassuring, although the planes are still in service with other airlines.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Fairey Battle Was A Total Bomb

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
battle
Arthur Tanner/Fox Photos/Getty Images
Arthur Tanner/Fox Photos/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Developed during the mid-1930s for the Royal Air Force (RAF) and powered with a Rolls-Royce Merlin piston engine, the Fairey Battle seemed a promising aircraft. But it proved the opposite, being heavy, slow, and with a limited range.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nearly 100 were shot down in a single week, and the RAF withdrew the Battle from service by the end of 1940. Many consider it to be one of the most disappointing aircraft in RAF service history.

ADVERTISEMENT

The LWS-6 Żubr Was An Ugly Duckling

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
zubr
Pinterest/paulomigliacci
Pinterest/paulomigliacci
ADVERTISEMENT

The LWS-6 Żubr was a Polish twin-engined bomber, produced prior to World War II. The aircraft never made it to combat, and were used for training purposes only although several of them were destroyed on the ground during battles.

ADVERTISEMENT

The faulty Żubr had many problems, such as an undercarriage that retracted on some landings. The Soviets captured four of them during their invasion of Poland and later used them as communication aircraft.

ADVERTISEMENT

Saab 340s Are Notoriously Noisy

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
saab
Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

The Saab 340 is a Swedish twin-engine turboprop commercial aircraft. It was designed and produced as the result of a partnership between Fairchild Aircraft and Saab AB in 1983. Still in service, the 340 is considered by some frequent flyers to be one of the noisiest commercial aircraft.

ADVERTISEMENT

Aviation enthusiast BuckeyeFanFlyer took to FlyerTalk to share this experience. "I flew the Saab-340 last week for the first time...I could not believe the loud noise of the engine, yes I was sitting right next [to] it. Might think about having earplugs available." Yes, earplugs sound like a great idea for a trip on this plane.

ADVERTISEMENT

The MD-80 Is No One's Favorite Commercial Aircraft

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
md-80
Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

In 2008, the New York Times published a lengthy list of problems that the passenger aircraft McDonnell Douglas MD-80 has exhibited over the years. The aircraft has been involved in multiple fatal crashes, killing many innocent people.

ADVERTISEMENT

Less important but still of note: the MD-80 is slow, cramped, and inefficient. It is still in service, most notably with Delta Air Lines and American Airlines, but many passengers prefer to travel in alternate planes.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Bombardier Dash 8 Can't Carry All Of Its Passengers' Luggage

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
dash-8
Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto via Getty Images
Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Reading aviation experts' experiences in certain aircraft really gives you a clear idea of how badly designed some of them are. Jalopnik user Crossdrilled wrote about the Bombardier Dash 8. "They use these to get across the smaller islands with small landing strips," he said before addressing his problem with the plane.

ADVERTISEMENT

"I can deal with the loud propeller noise and the tossing and turning by crosswinds, but what gets me the most is the fact that these planes cannot hold the luggage of every passenger on board for weight reasons. Ideally the solution is to tell persons to carry less luggage but most persons taking these smaller planes are transferring from a 757 or other planes."

ADVERTISEMENT

The 2004 Chevy SSR Was All For Show

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
chevvy-2004-ssr-45006
Scott Olson/Getty Images
Scott Olson/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

The SSR in Chevy SSR stands for "Super Sport Roadster." Upon release, consumers realized this car was anything but a super, sporty roadster. Instead, it was a heavy and slow failure of a car with shiny retro design.

ADVERTISEMENT

If only Chevy had cared as much about what was under the hood as they cared about what it looked like. The car's body was too heavy for its engine, resulting in a sluggish performance that many critics described as lazy. Just as quickly as this car was released, it was put to rest.

ADVERTISEMENT

No One Liked The Pontiac Aztek

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
pontiac-aztec-49930
Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

As soon as the Pontiac Aztek was announced, it was universally hated by car lovers. Critics claimed the design of the car itself made no sense, especially its oddly-shaped front end. It didn't help that the body was made of plastic instead of something safer.

ADVERTISEMENT

When Pontiac announced the features that would come with the Aztek and the price tag they would have to pay, it became clear the crossover was doomed. People just weren't willing to pay for unimpressive performance and underwhelming design.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Mustang II Was A Major Mistake

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ford-mustang-ii-82971
Gary Friedman/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
Gary Friedman/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Ford bought into the idea of Pinto like no one could have expected. The Mustang II was based on the same idea as the Pinto. It was designed as a coupe that was supposed to drive like a roadster.

ADVERTISEMENT

Like the Pinto, the Mustang II suffered from several fatal flaws, including a generally underwhelming performance. Upon its release, critics called it the poor man's AMC Gremlin, a similar car which offered better performance. Of course, the Gremlin wasn't popular either, so maybe that wasn't a good thing.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Lincoln Blackwood Vanished In Less Than One Year

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
lincoln-blackwood-23970
Ford Motor Company
Ford Motor Company
ADVERTISEMENT

Raise your hand if you remember the Lincoln Blackwood. Released in 2002, the crossover project between Lincoln and Ford was a strange attempt to create a luxury pick up truck. It was so strange that consumers rejected it entirely, and Lincoln and Ford pulled the plug in less than one year.

ADVERTISEMENT

In reality, there was nothing wrong with the car, it was just that everything Lincoln tried, from rear wheel drive to the luxury trimmed interior, seemed out of place in a truck.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Iconic Chevy Bel Air Is Actually A Dud

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
IRAN-AUTO-LIFESTYLE
BEHROUZ MEHRI/AFP via Getty Images
BEHROUZ MEHRI/AFP via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Here's a controversial opinion; the iconic Chevy Bel Air is actually one of the worst cars ever made. We're not talking about every Bel Air made, however, just the 1955-57 model. That's three years' worth of cars Chevy probably wishes didn't exist!

ADVERTISEMENT

The problem is there's nothing original about the Bel Air. Chevrolet took the most generic 1950s car design they could and mass-produced it. Maybe because it had the Chevy logo people thought more highly about it than they should have? On the bright side, the car itself drove fine.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Lamborghini LM002 Made Zero Sense

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
GettyImages-929478042-53418
Neilson Barnard/Getty Images
Neilson Barnard/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Lamborghini's first mistake in designing and releasing the LM002 was thinking their consumer base wanted to take their car off roading. Before being released to the public, Lamborghini marketed the LM002 to the American military with their "Cheetah" prototype.

ADVERTISEMENT

We don't think anyone buys a Lamborghini to go play in the mud, though. Lamborghini stuck by their beliefs, producing 382 of these off road super luxury vehicles between 1986 and 1993. It became known as the Lamborghini truck.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 1975 AMC Pacer Was Great For Professional Drivers

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
IRAN-AUTO-LIFESTYLE
BEHROUZ MEHRI/AFP via Getty Images
BEHROUZ MEHRI/AFP via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

The 1975 AMC Pacer did not help reverse the poor fortunes of the American Motor Company. Released at the height of the '70s compact car craze, the Pacer was the king of the hill when it came to size and fuel economy.

ADVERTISEMENT

Getting behind the wheel of one, however, turned out to be pretty dangerous. Critics were quick to point out the Pacer's poor performance and difficult handling. In other words, the car might have been fun for race car drivers, but not consumers who just wanted to get to and from work safely.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Maserati Biturbo Ruined The Brand's Reputation

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
GettyImages-836916486-75671
Post via Getty Images
Post via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

In the early '80s, Maserati was under new ownership who wanted to released a "more affordable" sports car under the brand name. The result was the Biturbo, a car which many blame for Maserati leaving the American market in 1991.

ADVERTISEMENT

Surprisingly, Maserati kept making Biturbos overseas until 1997. In 2002, the brand finally returned to the United States. The Maserati Spyder, priced at $89,000, helped the company return to prominence, with over 800 orders placed (high for a luxury model) before it was even shipped.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Cadillac Fleetwood Was The King Of Awkward

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
GettyImages-836876780-88945
Denver Post via Getty Images
Denver Post via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

The Cadillac Fleetwood that we're referring to was manufactured from 1976 until 1996 and never found stable footing in the market. Even though it lasted for 20 years, the car had a bad reputation for stalling, jerking, and making awkward noises.

ADVERTISEMENT

The name "Fleetwood" had been used as a pre-fix by Cadillac since 1935. It described cars with longer wheelbases than the DeVille and Series 62 Models. In 1996, the final year of the production, only 15,109 units were produced by Cadillac, less than half of the 1993 production number.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Ferrari Mondial 8 Was Never Meant For Greatness

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
GettyImages-876366836-23586
ullstein bild via Getty Images
ullstein bild via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ferrari Mondial 8 was produced for two years starting in 1980. In that time there was a rumor that every single model's system failed. That's how bad this car's reputation was. It was replaced in 1983 by the Mondial QV.

ADVERTISEMENT

At the time of its release, the Mondial 8 wasn't met with the worst reviews. It was called "impressive" and "respectable." It was only after the car was on the road for about a year that the truth came out. In a retrospective, Time Magazine listed it as the eighth worst car of all-time.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Chevrolet Chevette Was Too Late To The Party

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
chevrolet-chevette-worst-cars-73428
Bill Johnson/The Denver Post via Getty Images
Bill Johnson/The Denver Post via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Under the hood, there was nothing wrong with the Chevrolet Chevette. At the time Chevy commissioned the sub-compact car to be made, Americans were energy conscious, preferring fuel efficient and smaller cars. By the time the car finally came out, however, big trucks were making a comeback.

ADVERTISEMENT

Chevrolet initially predicted that 275,000 Chevettes would be sold, including 150,000 from import sales. By 1976, those same predictions were cut in half. By the end of the '70s, the Chevette became the best selling small car in America, which sadly wasn't enough to save it.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Trabant Was East Germany's Answer To Volkswagen's Beetle

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
GettyImages-956935672-78431
STEFAN SAUER/AFP/Getty Images
STEFAN SAUER/AFP/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

When the Berlin Wall went up, Germany was divided into West Germany and East Germany. Volkswagon existed in the west and was flying high on the success of the Beetle. East Germany refused to buy cars from the west and came up with the Trabant.

ADVERTISEMENT

The problem was too many features were missing from the Trabant to make it worth driving. There were no seat belts, the hood needed to be opened to refill its gas tank, and there was no fuel gauge or tachometer on the inside. Yikes!

ADVERTISEMENT

The Triumph TR7 Was A Maintenance Nightmare

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Triumph TR7 at the Geneva Motor Show.
WATFORD/Mirrorpix/Mirrorpix via Getty Images
WATFORD/Mirrorpix/Mirrorpix via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

From 1974 until 1981, the Triumph TR7 haunted roads in the Unites States and the United Kingdom. Well, it was supposed to come out in 1974, but production delays pushed back its actual release to 1975 (United States) and 1976 (United Kingdom), which was the first sign of trouble.

ADVERTISEMENT

Early models were littered with maintenance problem, turning the sports car into one of the more expensive vehicles to own. By 1980's redesign, a lot of these issues were gone and car enthusiasts were starting to come around, but it was too late for the general public to care.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Ford Pinto Is Legendarily Bad

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ford-pinto-bad-car-35614
Mardis Coers/Getty Images
Mardis Coers/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Be happy if you're too young to remember the Ford Pinto. Widely regarded as one of, if not the worst car ever made, the Pinto was a nightmare for Ford. Marketed as the future of compact cars, the Pinto offered decent performance and good fuel economy. The problem was it had a tendency to explode.

ADVERTISEMENT

That's not an over-exaggeration, either. The Pinto became notorious after its release for exploding when hit by another vehicle. Ford refused to fix the problem, instead preferring to pay any victims, we mean buyers, and end production of the vehicle.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Morgan Plus 8 Ran On Propane

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
GettyImages-534263418-59211
National Motor Museum/Heritage Images/Getty Images
National Motor Museum/Heritage Images/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Made by British manufacturer Morgan, the Morgan Plus 8 is credited with saving the company. That doesn't mean the car was without any quirks, though. In the United States specifically, the car was fitted to run off of propane, the only way it could pass emissions tests at the time.

ADVERTISEMENT

So what were the results of running the car on propane instead of traditional fuel? It felt sluggish, making 30 miles per hour feel like 60 miles per hours.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Smart Fortwo Was Too Hot To Handle

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
smart-car-forwto-wrost-ever-55823
Dominic Bracco Ii/The Washington Post/Getty Images
Dominic Bracco Ii/The Washington Post/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

In a big city where parking is limited, Smart Cars are immensely popular. They can fit just about anywhere, and have incredible fuel efficiency. That doesn't mean they're comfortable, though. The Smart Fortwo is the best example.

ADVERTISEMENT

Built with its engine in the back and cooling system in the front, it's easy to cook your passengers on a warm summer day. The heating and cooling problem proved to be too much for casual consumers, causing sales to plummet and almost bankrupting the brand.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Peel Trident Speaks For Itself

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
peel-trident-worst-cars-67110
National Motor Museum/Heritage Images/Getty Images
National Motor Museum/Heritage Images/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

What is there to say about the Peel Trident? It was launched in 1964 at the British Motorcycle Show and was intended to be used as an "occasional two-seater." By 1966, the Peel Engineering Company ended production on the strange little car.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Trident might be gone, but the legend lives on. On Monster Garage, Jesse James got his hands on one and tried to fit it with a motorcycle engine and new frame. The experiment failed and James destroyed the car for his television audience to see.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Chevy Vega Was Named 'Car Of The Year' Before Its Many Defects Became Known

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1975 Chevrolet Vega Cosworth. Creator: Unknown.
National Motor Museum/Heritage Images via Getty Images
National Motor Museum/Heritage Images via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

The Chevy Vega received plenty of attention and praise when it was first introduced. It was even named the 1971 Motor Trend Car of the Year! That good reputation quickly unraveled though, as the 1971 Vega was riddled with problems. From a tendency to rust, to being unreliable, to engineering and engine problems, the car was a disaster.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even though GM put the vehicle through a slew of design upgrades and recalls, it was just too much of a stain on the company's reputation and production ended with the 1977 model.

ADVERTISEMENT

Don't Let The Movie Fool You: The DeLorean DMC-12 Was A Failure

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
delorean-63757
National Motor Museum/Heritage Images/Getty Images
National Motor Museum/Heritage Images/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

The DeLorean DMC-12 is synonymous with the 1985 film Back to the Future, which is where many people were introduced to the iconic car. But don't let its fame or impressive appearance fool you: DeLoreans are often called expensive failures.

ADVERTISEMENT

Deloreans are known to have many issues with their electrical systems, which leads to general reliability problems. Additionally, the cars are underpowered and have poor build quality. There's still a huge demand for the, though. In 2016 DMC in Texas announced that it was making 300 replica models.

ADVERTISEMENT

The PT Cruiser Was A Blast From The Past

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
pt-cruiser-worst-cars-74159
Getty Images
Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

At some point in time, everything that was once old is new again. That was the case with the PT Cruiser, a retro style car released by Chrysler intended to use nostalgia as its best weapon. If only the car company had taken performance into account.

ADVERTISEMENT

The PT Cruiser failed to catch the eye of the consumer, who preferred more modern looking cars and better overall performance. Around the same, time Ford tried to relaunch the Thunderbird to similar lack of interest.